Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming modern warfare, redefining how nations prepare for and engage in conflict. From autonomous drones to predictive analytics and battlefield robots, AI is now at the core of strategic defense planning. However, this rise brings significant ethical, political, and technological ’s appeal in warfare lies in its efficiency and speed. Autonomous weapons can analyze vast amounts of data in real-time, respond faster than humans, and reduce the need for boots on the ground. For countries seeking to minimize casualties and increase precision, AI offers a competitive edge. Surveillance systems powered by AI can detect threats more accurately, and unmanned drones can carry out strikes with pinpoint , this technological leap also raises alarming concerns. Who is accountable when an AI-controlled system makes a fatal error? Can a machine truly distinguish between a combatant and a civilian in a dynamic environment? These questions remain largely unanswered, as legal frameworks struggle to keep pace with the speed of innovation. There is a growing fear that delegating life-or-death decisions to algorithms could lead to unintended, catastrophic , the global race to develop AI-powered weapons could ignite a new kind of arms race. Major powers like the , China, and Russia are heavily investing in military AI, and smaller nations may follow, potentially destabilizing global security. The lack of international regulations around AI in warfare compounds the , many argue that lethal autonomous weapons should be banned outright, calling for a global treaty similar to the bans on chemical weapons. Others contend that AI, if used responsibly, can reduce the horrors of war by limiting collateral damage and saving , the future of AI in warfare hinges on how we manage its development. Balancing military advantage with ethical responsibility, and establishing clear international norms, will be essential to prevent a dystopian future where machines decide who lives and who dies.
